It Is A Matter Of Biblical Authority!
Creation Validates Scripture

Click On Picture to see
Slideshow
Misconceptions and Misdirection not to forget Deception...
One of the misconceptions that the creationist faces is the declaration by evolutionists on how the argument is framed. Evolutionists say that the debate is between religion and science; that is wholly untrue! The debate is between interpretations of the evidence as the cartoon depicts. It is a debate between the interpretations of evolutionary bias over evidence versus the interpretations of creationist bias over the
evidence. It is the religion of evolution versus the religion of
creationism.
I like what Answers In Genesis president Ken Ham said, "It is essentially which is the best bias to be bias with..."
Check out these tremendous debate resources provided by Dr. Ken Hovind on Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jT-1niYxb8I
It is important to note that evolution has several meanings. The micro evolution, or varieties within kinds is real, observable, and scientific; however, this has never been observed or shown in the fossil record to lead to new kinds.
The problem arises when evidence for micro evolution is presented for proof of macro evolution. Macro evolution believes that all living things came from a common ancestor; that all living things actually came from rocks. It teaches that all of matter, energy, and time came into being from nothingness (the Big Bang). There is no indisputable evidence for macro evolution! What we have are interpretations of evidence that can also be interpreted for creation (See Picture below).
One of the misconceptions that the creationist faces is the declaration by evolutionists on how the argument is framed. Evolutionists say that the debate is between religion and science; that is wholly untrue! The debate is between interpretations of the evidence as the cartoon depicts. It is a debate between the interpretations of evolutionary bias over evidence versus the interpretations of creationist bias over the
evidence. It is the religion of evolution versus the religion of
creationism.
I like what Answers In Genesis president Ken Ham said, "It is essentially which is the best bias to be bias with..."
Check out these tremendous debate resources provided by Dr. Ken Hovind on Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jT-1niYxb8I
It is important to note that evolution has several meanings. The micro evolution, or varieties within kinds is real, observable, and scientific; however, this has never been observed or shown in the fossil record to lead to new kinds.
The problem arises when evidence for micro evolution is presented for proof of macro evolution. Macro evolution believes that all living things came from a common ancestor; that all living things actually came from rocks. It teaches that all of matter, energy, and time came into being from nothingness (the Big Bang). There is no indisputable evidence for macro evolution! What we have are interpretations of evidence that can also be interpreted for creation (See Picture below).
Creation Vs. Evolution: An In-depth Study Equipping The Church Against the Deceptions of Evolution!
Arguments About Information Darwin's Black Box Do You Know How Little Creation Science is Taught? (Power Point Version) Noah's Flood: Did it Occur? (Noah's Flood Power Point Version) The Tower of Babel Was it a Real Event? (World populated by Noah's 16 Grandsons) Written by Bodie Hodge Evolutionary Bible Genealogies Geology And Dating Issues Radioactive Dating Issues Why Is There Suffering in the World What is Going On? Where Does Sickness & Disease Come From? |
This study addresses the crisis of faith that occurs when we abandoned the true witness of scripture. It addresses the propaganda of evolution, the actual science that is used contrary to its true attributes. It continues with creation scientists statements, interpretations, and clear exposures of the problems of evolution.
Where does information come from? All evidence known to us has determined that information comes from and is understood by intelligence. The universe is filled with information that does not evolve it exists...infinite information comes only by an intelligent infinite being whom we know as God. Darwin said, “If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down.” Michael Behe shows that the tiniest single cell is vastly complex and is irreducible so that if any part is missing the cell dies. This truth is insurmountable as being explainable in terms of any evolutionary model. Many Churches do not address this debate it appears that less than 20% speak from the pulpit about it. Lord of Lords must be an elite church because creationism is a passion. This message reinforces what we do know and updates new evidences that validate the Bible. This Power Point Presentation provided many pictures of the evidences to help the reader understand... The evolutionary world has managed to convince a lot of people that Noah's Flood is just a myth. Furthermore, one particular leading biochemical evolutionists has declare anyone stupid, ignorant, or insane if they don't believe in evolution. Let's look as some pretty insane evidences that when interpreted from Noah's Flood perspective sure seem straight forward and sane... This adds illustrations, diagrams, visuals, pictures, to enhance the readers ability to grasp the message The evidence for the population of the world being spread by the 16 grandsons of Noah is overwhelming. Cities, countries, rivers, sites, having the same names, derivatives of those names, and the legends of those names is undeniable. If the Bible to accurate in one area it is all the more likely to be so in another... If evolution were true and God intended us to understand it as His divine process then the scriptures would have reflected it...this is a simple approach to give us an example. The genealogies of scripture absolutely ties the Bible to thousands of years not millions... The truth about Geology and dating; taking a look at many problems evolutionists have no answer for... The radioactive dating used by evolutionist to prove old ages is so flawed and inconsistent that if the Bible were similar in its methods Christianity would not exist. This helps explain from the Bible why suffering exists...it's because of sin and the fall! Breaking down the way the world works according the Biblical principles helps us to understand our very complex world. The Bible explains exactly where S & D come from and once we understand then other things fall into place... "Evolution is not shown in hard scientific evidence to be occurring anywhere we look, but it is adamantly affirmed to have happened where we cannot look." BDT from Booklet Darwin's Black Box
|
Wrestling over EvidenceThe debate is over interpretations of the same evidence!
This poster Points To the Real Issue...Every attribute given to evolution belongs to God!
-------------------------------------------- Darwin's Black BoxDarwin’s Black Box—What Evolutionist’s Don’t want you to know.
(Compiled from Michael Behe’s book Darwin’s Black Box) By B. D. Tate Darwin knew that his theory of gradual evolution by natural selection carried a heavy burden. He said, “If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down.” For decades and even a few centuries, our scientific community has been making sure that Darwin’s theory doesn’t break down. They have been touting authoritatively, pounding the pulpit harder so to speak, to make sure that everyone understands that evolution is a fact, not to be questioned with. Recently, I heard the report from a renowned university Professor of biology that anyone wishing to come to his university with any other foundation than evolution, need not apply. It is understood that no true scientist can ever allow an account for the world with any explanation other than natural causes. This understanding is called the “Rule.’ Science fundamentally is a game. It is a game with one overriding and defining rule—Rule No. 1: Let us see how far and to what extent we can explain the behavior of the physical and material universe in terms of purely physical and material causes, without invoking the supernatural. In other words, science must invoke only nature causes, and explain by reference only to natural law. (Richard Dickerson a prominent biochemist) Special Note: This is in complete conflict and denial of what God says He created the physical world for. The scriptures testify that creation reveals the creator and the heavens declare His glory. ***This rule is not scientific, it wasn’t discovered in a laboratory; it wasn’t the result of chemical reactions in a test tube; it isn’t testable at all--it is a philosophy. (More) |
Recommended Reading & Resources
1) Scientific Creationism, by Henry M. Morris, Master Books, Copyright 2001
2) In the Beginning was Information, by Werner Gitt, Copyright 2001
3) Refuting Compromise, by Jonathan Sarfati, Ph.D., Master Books, Copyright 2004
4) Big Argument: Does God Exist? John Ashton & Michael Westcott, 24 scholars Explore How Science, Archaelogy, and Philosophy Haven’t Disproved God., Master Books, Copyright 2006
Answers In Genesis: AnswersinGenesis.Com Website is an awesome resource...
Institute for Creation Research icr.org
Dr. Ken Hovind of Drdino.com
1) Scientific Creationism, by Henry M. Morris, Master Books, Copyright 2001
2) In the Beginning was Information, by Werner Gitt, Copyright 2001
3) Refuting Compromise, by Jonathan Sarfati, Ph.D., Master Books, Copyright 2004
4) Big Argument: Does God Exist? John Ashton & Michael Westcott, 24 scholars Explore How Science, Archaelogy, and Philosophy Haven’t Disproved God., Master Books, Copyright 2006
Answers In Genesis: AnswersinGenesis.Com Website is an awesome resource...
Institute for Creation Research icr.org
Dr. Ken Hovind of Drdino.com